States’ Multi-Billion Dollar Foreclosure Settlement With Big Banks Will Not Prevent Individual Claims

Yesterday, over 40 states entered into a settlement with the five major U.S. banks over fraudulent foreclosures based on robo-signing.  The banks involved were Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, and Ally Financial (formerly GMAC). 

Importantly, as confirmed by Michigan’s Attorney General, Bill Schuette, in his statement yesterday, the settlement “does not preclude … individual homeowners from pursuing their own claims.”  This is fortunate.  As part of the settlement, the consumers who had their homes fraudulently taken away will only receive “payouts of about $2,000 each”, as reported by The Washington Post.

Some might argue that a $2,000 payment is a nice bonus for those who lost their homes.  However, the homes were taken away due to illegal court filings and faulty affidavits.  When one considers the values of the homes, and the stress and frustration the homeowners went through when they were unjustly kicked out of their homes, it is clear that the $2,000 per homeowner is nothing more than a slap on the wrist to the banks.

According to the Maryland judiciary’s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure, “robo-signing” occurs in a foreclosure when the bank or its lawyer files an “affidavit as to which the affiant either did not have sufficient knowledge of the facts stated in the affidavit to validly attest to their accuracy or did not actually read or personally sign the affidavit.”  In other words, robo-signing is where a bank or its lawyer uses a sham affidavit to take away a person’s home.

Robo-signing is a problem because the American justice system should not be a shell game where the ends justify the means.  This is especially so when a person’s home is involved.  Instead, in a democracy based on respect for individual freedom and liberty, every phase of a lawsuit should be based on integrity.

If you found this article informative, and would like more free legal insights, then don't forget to follow us on Facebook or Twitter using the buttons below.

Would You Like to Comment or Make a Suggestion for a Future Blog Post?

All Fields Required
Your Information Will Not Be Published



Did you like this post? Yes No Not sure


Important Client Advisory:

Due to our high demand and dedication to existing clients, we are accepting new cases for court representation only in appeals within Maryland's appellate courts. For all other legal matters, although we are not entering appearances or attending court hearings, our team is available to offer robust legal consulting services including:

  • Legal Document Preparation: Drafting documents for clients to sign and file, ensuring compliance and precision.
  • Strategic Legal Advice: Offering guidance via phone or email to navigate complex legal challenges.
  • Court Argument Scripts: Crafting detailed scripts for effective opening and closing arguments.

For court appearances in non-appellate matters, we recommend engaging local counsel to ensure the best possible representation and support.