In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of Maryland clarified the conditions under which a juvenile court may award custody to a non-custodial parent in a child in need of assistance (CINA) case. The ruling in In re T.K., 480 Md. 122 (2022), examines the prerequisites for a court to award custody and the best interest standard that must be applied. This landmark decision offers essential guidance for child custody lawyers and Maryland family attorneys navigating the complex world of child custody disputes.

Prerequisites for Awarding Custody in CINA Cases

Under Maryland law, a juvenile court may only award custody to a non-custodial parent in a CINA case if two conditions are met: (1) the allegations in the petition are sustained against only one parent, and (2) another parent is available, able, and willing to care for the child. If these prerequisites are established, the court may exercise its discretion to award custody to the other parent.

These mandates are derived from Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 3-819(e). Simplified, they require that the evidence proves that only one of the parents is guilty of abuse or neglect of the child, and the other will likely take proper care of the child.

Best Interest Standard: The Key to Awarding Custody

If the prerequisites for awarding custody are met, the court must apply the best interest of the child standard when deciding whether and how to exercise its discretion. The court should consider factors such as the child’s emotional, educational, and physical needs, as well as the parents’ respective abilities to meet those needs. This standard helps ensure that the child’s well-being remains the primary focus of the court’s decision.

Right to Present Evidence in Custody Disputes

The court’s ruling in In re T.K. also clarifies when a parent who stands to lose custody in a CINA case is entitled to a hearing. The court held that a parent must be given the opportunity to present evidence if there are factual disputes relevant to the non-custodial parent’s ability and willingness to care for the child or to the court’s determination of the child’s best interest. This ensures that both parents have a fair opportunity to present their case and protect their fundamental parental rights.

Proffers are not sufficient unless counsel for both sides stipulate to them. In In re T.K., the lower court’s reliance on proffers was grounds for reversal because they were not submitted into evidence, and in fact, they were disputed.

Impact of In re T.K. on Child Custody Lawyers and Maryland Family Attorneys

The In re T.K. decision provides essential guidance for child custody lawyers and Maryland family attorneys handling CINA cases. It clarifies the conditions under which a juvenile court in CINA proceedings may award custody and the best interest standard that must be applied. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of giving both parents the opportunity to present evidence in custody disputes. As a result, this ruling helps to ensure equal protection in family law matters and promote the best interests of children in Maryland’s juvenile court system.

Conclusion: A Landmark Decision for Child Custody Disputes

In re T.K. offers crucial guidance for those involved in child custody disputes in Maryland, including child custody lawyers and Maryland family attorneys. By clarifying the prerequisites for awarding custody and the best interest standard that must be applied, this landmark decision helps ensure that the rights of parents and the well-being of children remain at the forefront of the court’s decision-making process.

Image Credit: Pixabay: LauritaM